School Science and
Mathematics Association
October 3-5, 2002
Rochester, New York,
Four Points Sheraton , Rochester Riverside
888-596-6400
|
|
||
| 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 | SSMA Board Meeting | President's Suite |
| 12:00 - 6 p.m. | Registration and Information | Coat Room (Mezzanine Level) |
|
|
|
||
| 1 | Eastman | Teacher Educators, Professional Developers | |
| Assessing Content and Pedagogical Knowledge of Mathematics | |||
| This session will discuss the evaluation of a mathematics Institute. The basic tools of the evaluation are: an item bank of content questions, pre- and post-observation of classroom teaching by the program director, portfolio assessments of teachers' mathematics journals, and participant satisfaction instruments. | |||
| Sue Brown
University of Houston - Clear Lake, Friendswood,TX |
|||
| 2 | Fitzhugh | K - 12 Teachers | |
| Science & Technology: The Natural and Designed Worlds | |||
| This session will focus on teaching methods for addressing three technological concepts: the nature of technology, technological design, and interrelationships between science, technology, and society. | |||
| Patrick Foster
Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT |
|||
| 3 | Anthony | Teacher Educators | |
| Three Disciplines, Three Educators, One Challenge: Integrating Mathematics, Science & Technology for Elementary Teacher Education | |||
| The presenter represents a team of three teacher educators given the challenge of integrating mathematics, science and technology for pre-service teachers. The presenter will share information from the planning stage, implementation and courses of actions, and lessons learned from the on-going experience. | |||
| Thomasenia Lott Adams
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL |
|||
| 4 | Gleason | Mathematics Teachers 6-12 | |
| Mission Possible AP Mathematics | |||
| Do you want a strong Math Team? Do you want a strong curriculum that is vertically and horizontally aligned? Do you want to raise test scores? Do you want to have a say in Staff Development? Do you want to encourage student enrollment in AP Math classes? Come learn about the benefits of having a strong Math Vertical Team. | |||
| Vicki Taylor Sam Rayburn Middle School Bryan, TX |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 5 | McQuaid | Mathematics and Science Teachers 8 – 16 | |
| The LOCS to HOCS Shift in Integrated Science: What Does It Take? | |||
|
|||
| Uri Zoller Haifa University Kiryat Tivon, Israel |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 6 | Eastman | Mathematics/Teachers, Teacher Educators | |
| A Methods Course in Secondary School Mathematics Using Study Works for Project Work and Write-ups | |||
|
|||
| William Blubaugh University of Northern Colorado Greeley, CO |
|||
| 7 | Fitzhugh | Mathematics Teachers 5-8, Researchers | |
Middle Grades Misconceptions in Statistical Thinking |
|||
|
|||
| Mary Margaret
Capraro, Gerald Kulm, Robert Capraro Texas A&M University College Station, TX |
|||
| 8 | Gleason | Elementary Science Teachers, Researchers | |
| Learning About Static Electricity and Magnetism in a Fourth Grade Class | |||
| A case study of grade four students constructing ideas about static electricity and magnetism through guided inquiry and discuss curricular implications will be presented and discussed. | |||
| David Henry Buffalo State College Buffalo, NY |
|||
| 9 | Anthony | Mathematics and
Science Teachers 6-12 |
|
| Problem Solving with Batteries & Bulbs | |||
| This session will be conducted
using a “learning cycle” approach, first exploring, then introducing, then
applying knowledge about electrical circuits. Participants will
work in collaborative groups to discover the characteristics of simple
electrical circuits, to summarize their observations, and to “test” what
they have learned on unknown circuits. |
|||
| Kevin Wise Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Carbondale, IL |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 10 | Gleason | Mathematics and
Science Teacher Educators |
|
| Reciprocal Concepts as a Guiding Principle for MST | |||
|
|||
| Karen Bell,
Cornelius DeGroot SUNY New Paltz New Paltz, NY |
|||
| 11 | Eastman | Elementary Teachers,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Investigating Connections Between Mathematics and Gross-Motor Movement | |||
| We will present data from 2 pilot
studies conducted in primary-grade classrooms comparing levels of motor
development, mathematics achievement, and cognitive development. |
|||
| Marilyn Sue Ford,
Virginia Usnick UNLV Las Vegas, NV |
|||
| 12 | Fitzhugh | K - 12 School Leaders, Higher Education Faculty | |
| Integrating Technology and Middle Level Mathematics Instruction in the State of Washington | |||
| This session will describe the first
year of implementation and evaluation data from a statewide initiative,
NO LIMIT!, promoting the integration of technology and mathematics instruction
in the middle grades. |
|||
| Kate Popejoy,
Oddmund Myhre, Chris Ohana Western Washington University Bellingham, WA |
|||
| 13 | Anthony | Teacher Educators |
|
| Student Development of Modules For Integrated Teaching & Learning of Mathematics & Science | |||
| This talk describes the Mathematics,
Science, and Technology Education (MSAT) program at The Ohio State University.
Included are the conceptualization and application of the Berlin and
White Integrated Science and Mathematics (BWISM) model and the use of
the BWISM template for the analysis of integrated learning activities. |
|||
| Arthur White,
Donna Berlin The Ohio State University Columbus, OH |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 14 | McQuaid | Science Teachers
K-8, Administrators |
|
| Using Hands-on Form and Function Analogies to Understand and Invent | |||
|
|||
| Audrey Rule,
Eric Olson State University of New York, Oswego Oswego, NY |
|||
(Cash Bar & Appetizers)
Thursday 5:00 – 6:00
pm
Committee Meetings:
6:00
– 7:00 pm: Reception in the Riverview Lounge
|
|
||
| 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Registration and Information | Coat Room (Mezzanine Level) |
|
7:00 a.m.—7:45 a.m. Continental Breakfast in
Riverview Ballroom on Mezzanine (7:30—7:50 a.m. SSMA Business Meeting)
|
|---|
|
|
|
||
| 15 | Anthony | Teachers K-12,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Integrating Science and Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future | |||
|
|||
| Donna Berlin
The Ohio State University Columbus, OH |
|||
| 16 | Eastman | Teachers 7-14 |
|
| Problem Solving Approach as an Indicator of Level of Expertise | |||
| Fifty-five university students of
varying mathematics background were given a set of reasonably challenging
word problems involving ratios and percentages. Trends in approach
to working toward a solution were found to emerge, and these trends tended
to be somewhat specific to each level of expertise. |
|||
| Oakley D. Hadfield
New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM |
|||
| 17 | Fitzhugh | Mathematics Teachers | |
| Investigating the Quality of Internet Mathematics Help | |||
| Mathematics problems were submitted
to five different Internet sites. The level of difficulty of problems ranged
from middle school mathematics to beginning abstract algebra and beginning
calculus to determine the quality of responses. Some data is provided from
research in preservice teachers' mathematics methods courses. |
|||
| Sandy Scaffetta
Johnson University of Oklahoma Norman, OK |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 18 | McQuaid | Teachers,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Developing Computational Skills in Contexts of Problem
Solving |
|||
|
|||
| Jerry Becker
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL
|
|||
| 19 | Keating | Mathematics and
Science Teachers 6-12 |
|
| Crystal Radios
for Your Classroom |
|||
| Participants will work in collaborative groups to construct
and test crystal radios. This activity will be followed by a discussion
of the theory of operation of crystal radios, how they demonstrate important
concepts in science and technology and how these devices can be successfully
used as classroom teaching tool |
|||
| Kevin Wise
Southern Illinois University Carbondale, IL |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 20 | Fitzhugh | Teacher Educators |
|
| Using Alternative Delivery Model to Enhance Learning and
Teaching |
|||
|
|||
| Shuhua An California State University Long Beach, CA |
|||
| 21 | Anthony | Science Teachers,
Researchers |
|
| Evolution in Public Science Classrooms: The Challenge
and the Controversy |
|||
| This presentation will provide a
brief overview of the history of evolution education with a focus on
the role of evolution in state standards. |
|||
| Kim Bilica
State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, NY |
|||
| 22 | Eastman | Mathematics Teachers 5-8, Teacher Educators | |
| Implementing
a Problem Solving Focus in the Middle Grades |
|||
| This talk describes the project, supported in part by
a Dwight D. Eisenhower Professional Development Program grant, which is aimed
at reforming several upper elementary and middle grade mathematics classrooms. |
|||
| John Koker
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, WI |
|||
| 23 | Gleason | Teachers,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Problem-Based Learning: Design Templates for
Integrating Math and Science |
|||
| Workshop format with demonstrations
and opportunities to apply design templates for lessons and thematic units
integrating mathematics and science. |
|||
| Carol Stuessy
Texas A&M University College Station, TX |
|||
|
10—10:30 a.m. Coffee Break in Prefunction Mezzanine |
|
|
|
||
| 24 | Keating | Mathematics Teachers
6-8, Teacher Educators |
|
| Conjecturing and Reasoning About Geometric Solids with
Geofix Shapes |
|||
|
|||
| Don Balka St. Mary’s College Notre Dame, IN |
|||
| 25 | McQuaid | Teachers, Teacher
Educators |
|
| Making Gender
and Culture Research Findings in the Literature Relevant, Applicable,
and Transferable to the classroom: A Study by Science and Mathematics
Teachers |
|||
| An extensive review of literature on gender and
cultural issues in science and mathematics education is followed by
classroom based teacher directed research on the relevance, applicability,
and transferability of these findings to their own classrooms. |
|||
| Pamela Abder
New York University New York, NY |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 26 | Anthony | General Interest |
|
| Setting a Course through NCTM s Principles and Standards |
|||
|
|||
| Peggy House
Northern Michigan University Marquette, MI |
|||
| 27 | Fitzhugh | Mathematics/Science
Teachers, Teacher Educators |
|
| The Use of Mathematics Software in Science Teaching
and Learning |
|||
| This presentation is to describe
how we use mathematics software such as the Geometers Sketchpad and
spreadsheet to help high school students simulate some of their experiments
in their learning of physical sciences. |
|||
| Zhonghong Jiang
Florida International University Miami, FL |
|||
| 28 | Gleason | Higher Education
Faculty |
|
| A Problem Solving
Learning Community Leads to Increased Success in College Chemistry |
|||
| Problem Solving for Chemistry is a math course (taken
only with a chemistry co-requisite) designed to develop the problem-solving
and mathematical reasoning abilities necessary for success in chemistry. |
|||
| Sue McMillen Buffalo State College Buffalo, NY |
|||
| 29 | Eastman | Mathematics/Science
Teachers 5-10 |
|
| There’s More than Science in the New Science Across
the World Program |
|||
| This session will introduce teachers
to the many opportunities for engaging their students in real activities,
gathering and dealing with real data and then using the web, fax or postal
system to exchange data throughout the world. Mathematics, science, language
arts, social studies (cultural characteristics) are integrated
in these activities. |
|||
| Norm Schmidt
John Carroll University University Hts., OH |
|||
|
Lunch: On Your Own |
|
|
|
||
| 30 | Gleason | Teachers,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Influences of How We Learned on How We Teach: A
Science Example |
|||
|
|||
| J. Steve Oliver
University of Georgia Athens Georgia |
|||
| 31 | Eastman | Teachers, Teacher Educators | |
| Expeditionary Learning on the Erie Canal |
|||
| Expeditionary learning as a form of instruction
is by no means new. Every effective teacher knows
that simply taking a trip is not sufficient to ensure that students
are learning anything. The goal of this project was
to train a cadre of teachers in this form of pedagogy by having them plan,
travel and disseminate the results of this experience. |
|||
| Eric Olson State University of New York – Oswego Oswego, NY |
|||
| 32 | Fitzhugh | General Interest |
|
| Technology -- Enabled Journey into Hidden Curriculum
of K-12 Mathematics |
|||
| The goal of this session is to
show how hidden aspects of the K-12 mathematics curriculum can be revealed
to pre-service teachers through the use of technology in context. |
|||
| Sergei Abramovich,
Peter Brouwer SUNY – Potsdam Potsdam, NY |
|||
| 33 | Anthony | General Interest |
|
| The Whys
of Proactive Grantseeking |
|||
| Why seek grants? - Because that's where the money is!
Why be proactive? - Attend this session and learn the basic steps
shared by successful grant seekers - those who are proactive.
The information presented will help participants become proactive grant
seekers, better equipping them for the highly competitive grant seeking
environment. |
|||
| Janet Beary-William Youngstown State University Youngstown, OH |
|||
|
FRIDAY 2:30 - 3:30
Microgravity Man MICROGRAVITY
MAN, when not fighting crime or averting crises, is a NASA scientist
at the NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER, in Cleveland, Ohio. As a scientist,
he uses weightlessness as a tool in his research on the complex nature
of flames. As a spokesman for NASA, MICROGRAVITY MAN hopes to encourage
and inspire youth in scientific endeavors of all disciplines. His true identity is kept secret to protect himself
and his family, but you can learn more about MICROGRAVITY MAN on the
World Wide Web: |
|
|
|
||
| 35 | Gleason | Primary Level
Teachers and Teacher Educators |
|
| Teaching Students to Understand Science Reading Materials
at the Primary Level |
|||
|
|||
| Ed Jones Miami University, Oxford, OH |
|||
| 36 | Anthony | Teacher Educators,
Researchers |
|
| The Effects of a Misconception-based Approach to
Science Methods |
|||
| This presentation will report
on the preliminary results of a misconceptions based approach to the
teaching of elementary science methods. Of particular interest
to attendees is the teaching participation portion of the course.
During this portion of the course, the methods students develop a working
knowledge of the application of this approach in the classroom setting. |
|||
| Michael Jabot SUNY Fredonia Fredonia, NY |
|||
| 37 | Fitzhugh | Teachers 4-8, Supervisors, Mathematics Educators | |
| Data Analysis
and Calculators: A Perfect Match |
|||
| This workshop will have participants actively engaged
in collecting data through activities that would be appealing to elementary
and middle school students. Through group discussions, decisions on
ways to |
|||
| Judith Olson,
Melfried Olson Western Illinois University Macomb, IL |
|||
| 38 | Eastman | Elementary Teachers | |
| Developing
Mathematical & Scientific Concepts and Processes Through the Arts |
|||
| For decades (possibly centuries), the arts have been
viewed as being disjoint from mathematics and science. This session
will provide a brief historical overview of the connections between the
arts and math/science as well as describe classroom art activities which
might develop math and science concepts and processes. |
|||
| Virginia Usnick,
Marilyn Sue Ford UNLV Las Vegas, NV |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 39 | Keating | SSMA Members |
|
| Using the SSMA CD as a Research Tool |
|||
|
|||
Bloomsburg University Bloomsburg, PA |
|||
| 40 | McQuaid | Mathematics Teachers 6 – 12 | |
| Incorporating Higher-Order Thinking Skills in the Mathematics
Classroom |
|||
| This session will discuss an assessment
framework which was created to assist teachers in incorporating higher-order
thinking skills and tasks in their classroom. Examples of how
teachers have used the framework and their classroom results will also
be discussed. |
|||
| Tony Thompson,
Kolouia Newsome University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL |
|||
|
|
|
||
| 41 | Eastman | K - 6 Teachers,
Teacher Educators |
|
| Implementing Everyday Mathematics: Will it Impact
Test Scores in Elementary Classroom? |
|||
|
|||
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Colorado Springs, CO |
|||
| 42 | Mathematics Teachers,
Educators |
||
| Mathematical
Misconceptions of Undergraduate Students |
|||
| This session will provide findings from a study that
examined some of the mathematical misconceptions of undergraduate students,
followed by a discussion on how to address these misunderstandings in
a methods course. A discussion will be held to identify additional
conceptual errors of undergraduate students. |
|||
| Sally Robison,
Amy Bingham Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL |
|||
| 43 | Teachers K-5,
Administrators |
||
| Individualizing Mathematics with Hands-on Problem
Solving Materials for K-5 |
|||
| Elementary teachers will be shown
successful strategies, problem-solving techniques, and hands-on materials
used for individualizing instruction and tracking student progress in
a general education classroom, so that all students may work at appropriate
levels and progress at their own rates. |
|||
| Audrey Rule, Maria
Hendrix, Marcia Burrell State University of New York, Oswego Oswego, NY |
|||
| 44 | Teachers K-5,
Administrators |
||
| Using Backward Curriculum
Design to Refocus Lab Activities and Incorporate Research Design Techniques
in the Less is More Era |
|||
| Participants engage in a backward curriculum design model
to modify classical osmosis laboratory activities to provide students
experience developing inquiry and research techniques and skills. |
|||
| Richard Schlenker Department of Defense Dependents Schools -- Korea |
|||
|
Banquet 6 -
9 p.m.
Keynote Address: "Confessions
of a Pure Mathematician on Becoming a Closet Scientist" Vince Delisi T3*Teachers
Teaching with Technology
|
|
|
|
7:00 a.m.—7:45 a.m. Continental Breakfast in Riverview Ballroom on Mezzanine |
|
|
|
||
| 45 | Anthony | Teachers K-8 |
|
| Inquiry Approaches to Understanding Multiplication | |||
|
|||
| Judith Kerekes
CUNY/CSI Staten Island, NY |
|||
| 46 | Teachers 6-12, Teacher Educators | ||
| Online Mathematics
Assessment as an Assisted Learning Tool |
|||
| An innovative online mathematics assessment with
automated score and feedback will be introduced. Participants will
also have an opportunity to learn about the potential effects of this innovative
online assessment on students' mathematics performances and learning attitudes. | |||